Prediction of Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong [617th] vs Kabir Hans [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W W L L
Form
L L W L W W L W W LH2H: Leong 1 - 0 Hans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Leong winning 2 and Hans winning 0. The last match between Leong and Hans was at the M15 Davangere, 25-10-2023, First, Hard with Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong | 1 |
| Kabir Hans | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Kabir Hans
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:44:0 | Average Match Time | 1:44:0 |
| 52% (33/63) | 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 47% (14/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 49% (34/69) | Return Points Win % | 38% (24/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong vs Kabir Hans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Leong 1 - 0 Hans
Editorial Prediction:
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
67%
(
80 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
127)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
86)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Duckhee Lee
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Giorgio Tabacco
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Artur Kukasian
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
3
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Maxim Zhukov
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Xing Dao Chen
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
63 of
79)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
3
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Kabir Hans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kabir Hans
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Faisal Qamar
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Kabir Hans
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Smit Nileshbhai Patel
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Kabir Hans
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Kabir Hans
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Kabir Hans
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (86/73) | Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) |
| 54% (192/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (82/63) |
| 52% (1725/1580) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (722/621) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 687 | Aces Total | 87 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 465 | Total Double Faults | 119 |
| 1:36:21 | Average Match Time | 1:4:16 |
| 435.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 288.39 |
| 62% (6004/9725) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1756/2799) |
| 68% (4080/6004) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1173/1756) |
| 45% (1693/3721) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (526/1043) |
| 45% (489/1080) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (134/287) |
| 43% (4182/9709) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1170/2847) |
| 53% (83/156) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (37/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (18/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 41% (15/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 90% (84/76) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (37/34) |
| 10% (84/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (37/3) |
| 13% (75/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (29/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
